Showing posts with label trai. Show all posts
Showing posts with label trai. Show all posts

Thursday, February 2, 2012

Broadband Users At 13.3M; 3.4M Mobile Users Switch Cellular Operator In Dec

India added 1.7 lakh new broadband subscribers in the month of December(1.5 lakh in November) to take the total user base of high speed Internet to 13.3 million, according to the latest report released by telecom regulator.
 According to Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), there has been a growth of 1.3 per cent in December over the previous month (November 2011).
Meanwhile, the total wireless mobile subscriber base has risen from 884.37 million at the end of November to 893.84 million in December, registering a growth of 1.07 per cent.
What we found interesting is the sharp swing in numbers compared to the previous month, when apparently the net addition was just 2.97 million subscribers due to massive disconnection of 5.22 million from the existing wireless subscribers. Bulk of this came from Tata Tele that lost over 4.4 million users or about 5 per cent of its total users in a single month. As per Trai’s data, Tata Tele lost around one in ten users in Mumbai and Delhi besides seeing loss in subscriber base in most other states in November. We had noted this here.
This was a huge number for any operator to lose in a month and this came right after the company said it will offer one common brand- Tata Docomo cutting across the CDMA and GSM platforms( which meant Tata Docomo moves into the CDMA space and all the existing Tata Indicom customers to migrate to Tata Docomo).
Tata Tele bounced back fairly quickly even though the net addition in December for the firm is not much to write about as it added just over 1 lakh new users and was even beaten by PSU telco BSNL on that front, not to talk about other bigger private players.
In December, only Videocon and S-tel saw drop in subscriber numbers.
Of the total wireless user base in India, around one in four are not active subscribers. Out of the total 893.84 million subscribers, 646.77 million were active on the date of Peak VLR for the month of December (The total active VLR number excludes the CDMA VLR figure of BSNL, as the service provider has not provided the VLR figures of their total CDMA subscriber base of 4.33 million). The proportion of VLR subscribers is approximately 72.3 per cent of the total wireless subscriber base reported by the service providers.
Circle-wise, J&K has the highest proportion of VLR subscribers with 83.11 per cent followed by Madhya Pradesh(78.45 per cent) and Maharashtra (78.06 per cent); Mumbai has the lowest proportion with 60.79 per cent. Service provider wise, Idea leads the tally with 92.98 per cent followed by Bharti (90.02 per cent); Etisalat is at the bottom with 25.45 per cent. This means the report found just about one in four of Etisalat subscribers are actively using their number.
The TRAI report also reveals (based on the data submitted by service providers by the end of December) about 2.92 crore subscribers have submitted requests for porting their mobile number with December alone witnessing a submission of 34.03 lakh(26.71 lakh in November) requests for changing service provider while retaining the number.
The average mobile number portability (MNP) requests have been around 25 lakh for the past few months and in November it crossed the 26 lakh number for the first time. The December mark is an all-time high translating into one in every 260 mobile users in the country switching their operator in a month.
Out of the total MNP requests till end of December, Gujarat (27.69 lakh) reported the highest number requests in the MNP zone-I (northern and western India). Following it was Maharashtra (23.13 lakh).  In the MNP Zone-II that includes southern and eastern India, Karnataka (28.33 lakh) tops the list while the Andhra Pradesh circle came second with 26.87 lakh requests.
So, cellular services providers in Gujarat, Maharashtra, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh are finding it most difficult to hold on to consumer loyalty.

Saturday, January 28, 2012

TRAI exempts limit of 200 SMS a day which are sent to, generated by machines


The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) has exempted the daily SMS limit of 200 for machine to machine and person to machine messages. TRAI restricted mobile users from sending more than 100 SMS / day per SIM starting 27th September 2011, to prevent pesky marketing SMS. Later they increased the limit from 100 to 200 SMS / day per SIM.

TRAI exempted the limit for these business houses after they received representations from the stakeholders that they were not able to send machine to machine and person to machine SMSs which are sent by them to initiate process or application for their operational requirements.

These services include providing details of driver or taxi on booking of Radio Taxi, tentative date of delivery of goods, tentative date of attending complaint, contact details of person attending the complaint etc

Monday, January 23, 2012

TRAI to block bulk international SMSes next

In a move, which proved to be a benchmark of sorts, last year, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) declared that users troubled with an endless stream of calls and SMSes from telemarketers could put an end to it by registering their number under NCPR. The National Customer Preference Register or the NCPR allowed users to block 'unsolicited commercial calls and/or SMSes'. While this clearly meant that the registered numbers would never receive SMSes, and calls from telemarketers, it also put some bars on the limit of SMSes that could be sent and/or received. However, riddance seemed a better bargain. Soon, however, it seemed that the relief was shortlived, since some telemarketers used a different ploy to continue sending messages to battered users - they moved to servers located overseas. Soon enough, in an almost replica of their previous situation, despite being registered under NCPR users began receiving scores of SMSes.
New guidelines should put an end to pesky SMSes (Image credit: Getty Images)


Now, after careful contemplation and planning, TRAI issued an official statement following which, all Access Providers and International Long Distance Operators will be expected to block all bulk international SMSes. When the TRAI began receiving complaints from irate users about receiving scores of SMSes, despite having registered, it decided to look into the matter. Here's what it found - It was seen that generally such SMSes originated from locations within Germany, Sweden, Nauru, Fiji, Cambodia, Bosnia, Albania, Grenada, UK, Jersey, Sint  Maarten, Tonga, Vanuatu, Namibia, Panama, Antigua and Barbuda, among others. Additionally, SMSes from these locations were found to come with alphanumeric headers or began with +91 or numbers with international codes, further rousing their suspicion. Soon, the regulatory body held meetings with telcos and ILD operators to discuss at length about this menace. It was decided that there is, indeed the need to have a stronger framework of guidelines in place, which could keep such unsolicited communication in check, especially ones which come from foreign-based servers. Given below is TRAI's 3-point plan to effectively tackle the issue:

  • All international SMS containing alphabet header or alphanumeric header or +91 as originating country code should not be delivered through the network. 
  • If any source or number from outside the country generates more than two hundred SMS per hour with similar ‘signature’, the same should not be delivered through the network. However, such restriction shall not be applicable on blackout days.
  • Only valid codes associated with the network of those entities with whom agreements have been signed by the Access Providers shall be allowed in the network.

Considering that to put the above mentioned guidelines to work effectively, the telcos and operators need time, TRAI has issued a 30-day duration. What do you think of these new guidelines? Do you think they would be effective in barring SMSs coming from foreign-based servers? Let us know in the comments section below.